RMNP Shuts Glacier Gorge: Reroute to Sky Pond, Mills Lake
We called this one in April. Our guide to Yosemite’s reservation-free 2026 said the quiet part out loud: removing the timed-entry system wouldn’t remove the crowding problem, it would just move it from a reservation window to a parking lot. The National Park Service confirmed back in February that Yosemite wouldn’t require vehicle reservations for the 2026 season, the first fully open-access summer since 2020. Nobody disputes that part anymore. What’s harder to dispute now, five months later, is that the prediction landed exactly as unpleasantly as it sounds.
By July, two U.S. senators were writing a formal letter to the Department of the Interior about it. By September, CNN was still reporting on a park that hadn’t caught its breath. And as of this week, there’s still no answer on whether 2027 looks any different.
Quick Verdict: Yosemite Reservations, Sept. 20, 2026
Question Answer Are reservations required right now? No. Eliminated for all of 2026, still gone as of this fall Did crowding get worse without them? Yes. March 2026 visitation hit ~225,800, up ~45% from ~155,800 in March 2025 Did anyone in Washington push back? Yes. Sens. Padilla and Schiff sent a formal letter to DOI on July 1, 2026 Did the reservation system come back for 2026? No. DOI committed to monitoring wait times, not reinstating the system Is the problem still happening in fall? Yes. A CNN feature published Sept. 19, 2026 confirms strain continues Is there a 2027 decision yet? No official announcement either way Is Half Dome’s permit lottery affected? No. That system runs separately and was never touched In one sentence: Yosemite’s 2026 reservation elimination triggered the crowding it was warned about, drew a Senate letter demanding answers, and heads into fall with the underlying strain still unresolved and zero word on what happens in 2027.
That last point is the whole story, honestly. A cap either exists or it doesn’t. Yosemite chose “doesn’t,” and the Valley’s roughly 1,400 parking spaces were left to sort out the rest on their own.
March 2026 gave the clearest early signal. Yosemite logged approximately 225,800 recreational visitors that month, up about 45% from the roughly 155,800 visitors in March 2025, per National Park Service visitation data. That’s not a shoulder-season blip. It’s the highest March total the park has seen in a decade, and it landed before summer even started, back when the reservation system would normally have still been throttling weekend demand.
Summer made it visible in a way spreadsheets can’t. Vehicles backed up along the roads under El Capitan. Valley parking lots that already filled by 8 or 9am in past seasons started filling earlier. One visitor comment on Yosemite’s own Facebook page, cited in wire reporting on the fallout, put it about as plainly as it gets: “Gridlock. Cars everywhere. People everywhere. No parking. No space.” Sierra Club Sierra Nevada program manager Mark Rose went further, telling reporters the administration’s approach was “creating pure chaos for visitors.” Park advocates don’t usually reach for that phrase lightly, and by early summer it had become the default way to describe what Yosemite Valley felt like on a Saturday.
None of that should surprise anyone who read our April breakdown of the parking math. Four million annual visitors and a seven-mile valley were never going to resolve themselves just because the friction point moved from a reservation window to a parking lot gate. We said arrive-before-8am would become the new reservation. We didn’t expect it to become a Senate issue by July.
On July 1, 2026, Sens. Alex Padilla and Adam Schiff sent a formal letter to Interior Secretary Doug Burgum and Acting NPS Director Jessica Bowron. Both California Democrats. Both representing a state that watched its most-visited national park turn into what their letter described as “bumper-to-bumper traffic around the valley floor, hiking trails backed up with people, and parking lots full in the early mornings.” Much of that strain concentrated around Yosemite Valley’s marquee spots, El Capitan and the Half Dome trailhead among them.
The letter wasn’t a symbolic gesture. It asked specific, answerable questions: what scientific evaluation or public stakeholder process led NPS to conclude a reservation system wasn’t necessary for 2026, what studies are currently tracking visitor impact on wildlife and meadows, and, pointedly, whether the agency would reinstate something like the 2024 system if the season kept getting worse. The full press release lays out the pressure in more detail than the letter itself.
Padilla didn’t stop at a letter, either. When DOI’s nominee for Assistant Secretary of Fish and Wildlife and Parks, Kevin Lilly, came up for a confirmation hearing, Padilla pressed him directly on Yosemite. He got a commitment out of it: NPS would keep monitoring wait times through peak season and invest in capacity. What he didn’t get was a reservation system. Lilly reportedly called capping park access “unsettling” and pointed instead toward measures like one-way traffic patterns and expedited “fast pass” options: management tweaks, not the demand cap the senators were actually asking for.
That’s the July outcome in a sentence: acknowledgment without reversal. DOI conceded the problem was real enough to warrant a hearing question and a monitoring commitment. It didn’t concede that the fix was bringing back what worked before.
If the assumption was that Labor Day would quiet things down and the story would fade, CNN’s September 19, 2026 feature on strain across the park system says otherwise. The piece (reported alongside an earlier CNN feature from July that compared national park crowds to “L.A. at rush hour”) describes a National Park Service that lost roughly 2,000 permanent staff between 2011 and 2024, and even after a hiring freeze lifted in October 2025, new hires are capped at one for every four employees who leave. Most vacancies simply aren’t getting filled.
For Yosemite specifically, that reporting ties directly back to the reservation question: a park managing record demand with a smaller staff than it had a decade ago, and without the one tool that used to smooth out the worst of it. Morale among Yosemite’s own NPS employees has reportedly hit historic lows, driven by inadequate housing and budget cuts, with staffing gaps compounding on top of a visitor surge nobody capped. This isn’t a July problem that solved itself by September. It’s a structural one, and structural problems don’t care what month the calendar says.
Nobody knows yet, and that’s not evasive hedging. It’s the actual state of things as of this week. NPS hasn’t issued a 2027 announcement in either direction. No proposed rule, no public comment period, no “reservations return” or “reservations stay gone” statement from the agency that would actually make the call.
Here’s what we’d weigh if we were betting on it. Against a 2027 return: the current administration eliminated the system in the first place, reportedly without the kind of scientific review the senators asked about, and Lilly’s hearing comments leaned toward alternative traffic-management tools rather than a cap. For a return: a documented 45% March visitation jump, a formal Senate letter with the agency’s own leadership named in it, and reporting that’s now stretched from July into September showing the underlying strain never eased. That’s a fair amount of political and operational pressure sitting on one side of the scale.
Our honest read: watch for any announcement in the window between now and next spring’s typical reservation-planning season (if 2024’s and 2025’s timelines are any guide, that’s usually a winter announcement for the following summer). If nothing’s said by then, treat a fourth reservation-free summer as the default. We’ll update this post the moment NPS says anything official. Don’t take a rumor or a single senator’s tweet as confirmation either way.
The good news, if there is any: fall crowding is real but nowhere near summer’s. Post-Labor Day visitation drops noticeably, and by October the Valley stops feeling like a parking lot with scenery attached. A few things worth knowing before you go:
For context on how differently parks have handled this same demand-versus-capacity fight this year, Rocky Mountain National Park kept its timed-entry system for 2026 rather than following Yosemite’s lead, and the staffing pressure behind Yosemite’s strain connects to the same funding fights we tracked in our national parks shutdown coverage this month.
Yosemite dropped its reservation requirement for 2026, and the crowding and parking chaos that followed weren’t a surprise to anyone who’d looked at the math beforehand. We didn’t either, back in April. What changed since then is the scale of the response: a formal Senate letter naming the Interior Secretary directly, a confirmation hearing where a DOI nominee got pressed specifically on this park, and now a September feature confirming the strain never actually let up once summer ended. None of that has produced a reservation system. It’s produced a monitoring commitment and some traffic-pattern tweaks, which is a different thing.
The 2027 question is genuinely open. Not “probably yes” or “probably no” — actually undecided, at least publicly. If you’re planning that far out, build your trip around the park you can already count on: the Valley and the Half Dome lottery, plus a fall shoulder season that’s still worth chasing. Don’t build it around a reservation system that may or may not exist by the time you need it.
Visitation figures per National Park Service data, reported widely including by Yahoo News. July 2026 Senate letter and confirmation hearing details per Sen. Alex Padilla’s office and additional coverage. Fall 2026 staffing and strain reporting per CNN. Information current as of Sept. 20, 2026. Confirm any 2027 reservation announcement directly at nps.gov/yose before planning next year’s trip.